Showing posts with label Indie Photobook Library. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Indie Photobook Library. Show all posts

11.19.2012

Interview: Larissa Leclair


Larissa Leclair is a writer, curator, collector, and the Founder of the Indie Photobook Library. The iPL is an archive of self-published and independently produced photobooks, artist books, photozines, and other genres not usually collected by traditional libraries in the United States.

Leclair is assembling this archive with the foresight and understanding our contemporary era will be - in part - defined by what she terms in the interview as the “second wave of self-publishing” as well as by photobooks more generally. She has been aggressive about taking the library on the road to galleries and festivals, an innovative structure that ensures the library’s contemporary relevance in addition to its historic value for future scholars and photographers. By concentrating these books in one collection, she has also created a unique opportunity to study contemporary alternative publishing in depth, a depth she ensures with an open submissions policy that keeps the archive free of curatorial biases and provides a democratic cross-section of materials. The library’s exploding growth proves both the need and its importance.

This interview complements the information about Leclair and the iPL found in other interviews she has previously done, including those on B, Lenscratch, Visura Magazine, and Hey, Hot Shot! It explores her thoughts on the history of photobooks, her vision of the contemporary publishing landscape, and her ideas on the strengths and limitations of the format.

The Indie Photobook Library can be found on Twitter and Facebook.

fototazo: What is the backstory on how the iPL formed? What gave you the drive to create a photography book library?

Larissa Leclair: I started off as a photographer, but my interest in archives began in graduate school, when I spent most of my time researching and working in Manuscripts & Archives at Yale University with photographs, postcards, ephemera and books. I came to understand the life of objects and the role of an archive – both its strengths and its pitfalls. While there, I was a member of the Photographic Memory Workshops and continue to be part of it now, ten years later. Each year the PMW and the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library team up to present a Master Class. Graduate students and scholars are given the opportunity to spend a day (or two, or four) with an entire collection from the Western Americana Collection at the Beinecke, along with the photographer of the collection or expert scholars on the collection. The Master Class in April of 2010, that I attended, focused on the Peter Palmquist Collection. Peter Palmquist’s life mission after retiring was very inspiring and his collection has and will have a big impact on the history of photography specifically relating to women in photography since the late 1800’s. It will enable photo historians to fill in the gender gaps. The vision encapsulated in his collection, and the fact that he had done it on his own, was the final piece of encouragement I needed.

The idea of creating a non-circulating library has been in my head for many years. It was an idea I wanted to bring to the table for a non-profit organization and at that time my focus was a broad range of international titles and making them available to a U.S. audience. That initiative never materialized but the idea stayed and evolved. Starting in 2009, with the rise of self-published books and the Blurb Photography Book Now competition, I was personally frustrated with not being able to view most of these books in person. So the idea of wishing for a central place to look at these kinds of books was in my head on the day I saw Peter Palmquist’s archive. I was blown away that a single individual could follow his passion, and create a collection without institutional support, and in the process have an impact on the history of photography. I realized I was not only interested in promoting indie published books, but most importantly, interested in creating a lasting archive. So two weeks after the Master Class - with the idea, one photobook, and a Facebook page - I founded the Indie Photobook Library in May of 2010.

In the last two and a half years of the iPL’s history, I have organized 20 pop-up library spaces and feature-length photobook exhibitions from the iPL archive, lectured at conferences and universities, been a consultant for other photobook exhibitions, and written about photobooks. The goals of the Indie Photobook Library are twofold: to showcase independent and self-published photobooks to be seen in person now (not just on the web) and to preserve them for future generations. The concept is a browse-able archive or non-circulating public library and the iPL has already become a benchmark collection in such a short time. Having a specific collection dedicated to these kinds of books allows for the development of future discourse on trends in self-publishing, the ability to reflect on and compare books in the collection, and for scholarly research to be conducted in years, decades and centuries to come.

© Stephanie Obernesser, Flash Forward Festival

f: Share with us a short history of the photobook. When did it begin to evolve as a vehicle for art photographers and what are some of the landmarks of its subsequent history?

LL: Since the beginning of the photographic medium with Fox Talbot’s The Pencil of Nature, the book has been an integral part of the history of photography; a part that has been substantiated and can easily be read about in Martin Parr and Gerry Badger’s The Photobook: A History. Volume 3 will be coming out soon. So the history of the photobook is as long as the history of photography itself. Anna Atkins, Francis Frith, Julia Margaret Cameron, Alexander Gardner were all putting their work into books. There was Muybridge; Japanese photobooks from the 1960’s and 70’s; Ed Ruscha; punk zines; and now this explosion with self-publishing and collaborative and independent small presses. That is egregiously abbreviated. There is so much to discuss! Yet even the photobooks covered in Parr and Badger is just a starting point. When I teach the history of photography, I discuss subjective history and offer parallel “histories” of the medium. I look forward to a truly inclusive “world” history of photography. And when I lecture about photobooks, I stress to the audience to make sure history remembers you by putting at least one copy of your photobook in a public collection. There is never a definitive history and it is always being written. And the Indie Photobook Library is playing a role in collecting photobook history today as it is happening and influencing what should be included in its ongoing history.

f: Lots of people have commented over the past few years that we’re in a photobook Golden Age. Do you think this is true? If so, what are the dynamics that would define this as a Golden Age?

LL: As online and print media are talking about the disappearance of the paper book form, the photography community is embracing the physical book. We indeed are seeing a renaissance, or Golden Age, for self-published and independently published books. The e-book world is having little effect on the DIY photobook culture. In my lecture at the New York Art Book Fair at MoMA PS1 in 2011, I categorized this current photobook movement as a second wave of self-publishing. The bookmakers of today continue the trail paved by those who challenged the paradigm in the 60’s and 70’s. Advances in digital printing and the option of POD in the last decade has greatly impacted the proliferation of self-published photobooks and has broken down barriers in thought and production for photographers wanting to put out their own book. The traditional publishing paradigm is being challenged. The mindset has changed. It can be done on your own!

f: What do you believe are the strengths and inherent limitations of the photobook format, as opposed to showing photographs on a wall or in a digital or multi-media format?

LL: Moholy-Nagy believed that the book form was the ideal format for photography. It is my preferred way of looking, revisiting, and owning work. Ruscha argued about his own work that the subject matter on the surface may not be that interesting, but once collected, compiled, and sequenced in book form, the package becomes something entirely different. The photobook can be as much an artistic object as the work inside and is a valid venue for viewing photography. Often the book form is the paramount space for a particular body of work. I see the photobook as a self-contained exhibition able to be revisited again and again, long after a traditional exhibition would be de-installed. The book form counters that ephemeral existence of exhibitions.

© Roberto Bocci, Georgetown University Guest Lecture

f: Is a photographer’s style, voice, or “sensibility” something equally apparent in their photobooks as in their images?

LL: The photobooks that embody the sensibility of the artist and the photographic work inside are usually the most successful in my opinion. It is the culmination of the components - the photography, design, details, and book concept manifested together. Rather than just a book of photographs, it is the book-as-object.

f: Do you believe that some form of narrative is inherent in a book format, no matter how aggressively it is attacked?

LL: There is an inherent sequencing that happens in a book that creates relationships between the images. But not everyone looks at a book the same way – front-to-back, back-to-front, middle and then flip-through. There are plenty of photobooks that are unbound and thus the original “narrative” changes according to the viewer. Some photographers try and direct the viewer, while others leave the narrative very wide open. Visitor by Ofer Wolberger completely upends the sequencing and narrative of the traditional book form.

f: What are as the trends in contemporary photobooks that you are noticing as you engage with new books on a daily basis?

LL: I’ll list a few: The Dutch are consistently amazing photobook designers and makers. Newsprint, in all its tones and weights, is being utilized by everyone - from students of photography to established photographers. And bookmakers are using the print-on-demand platform just as a starting point for their photobook - pushing the possibilities - and putting their artistic stamp on it.

f: Are we reaching a point of photobook saturation in terms of volume of production for the market that exists? How do you see the current state of the independent, self-published book market?

LL: Sure the photobook market is a niche market; one that seems to be overflowing with self-published books. But there are plenty of photobooks that sell through their print-run very quickly. I’ll answer the question this way. Photobook makers should be realistic about the size of their audience and don’t print an unrealistic number.

f: If you could have one photobook you don’t already own, for free, which would it be?

LL: Wow, what a question! For the Indie Photobook Library, anything by Ed Rushca; Mishka Henner’s Astronomical; and Cristina De Middel’s The Afronauts. For my own personal collection, I’d love a volume by Maxime Du Camp. And two books I missed out on when they were in print were Andrew Roth’s The Book of 101 Books and Flamboya by Viviane Sassen. Was that just one?

© Laura Chenault, Gallery Carte Blanche

f: Talk with us about the recent iPL exhibition at Carte Blanche. What were the goals and subject of the exhibition?

LL: One of the most recent iPL exhibitions, “A Survey of Documentary Styles in early 21st Century Photobooks” started at Gallery Carte Blanche in San Francisco and had the opportunity to travel to Washington, DC. There may even be a few more itinerations of the exhibition. I know the title is a mouthful, but Darius Himes (co-curator) and I wanted to be explicit in conveying all the components of the exhibition. The exhibition looks at documentary photography in a very broad way. While there are some books that speak a more traditional documentary language, most do not. There are books that critique the documentary tradition, diaristic books, typology studies, narratives based on found and vernacular imagery, and photobooks that borrow heavily from an art-photography storehouse. The primary medium is photobooks from the Indie Photobook Library archive, rather than photographic prints exclusively, as in a traditional exhibition. Yet, there were prints included for the first time in this Indie Photobook Library exhibition. From the 70 photobooks, Gwen Lafage, Founder of Gallery Carte Blanche, selected a total of 16 images by 6 photographers (Michael Jang, Erica McDonald, McNair Evans, Matt Eich, Lacey Terrell and Eliot Dudik) to accompany the books. This created a dynamic dialogue for viewing and experiencing photography. The exhibition is a very current and contemporary analysis of self-publishing, presentation of photographic work and documentary styles.

f: Do you have specific ideas and goals for further exhibitions at this point that you're looking forward to working on?

LL: The pop-up library spaces and traveling exhibitions are an initial way of showcasing the books in the archive, but from the beginning, I have always wanted a permanent space for the entire Indie Photobook Library. The space would operate as a browse-able archive or non-circulating public library. In the meantime, I continue to collaborate with universities, galleries, and festivals and look forward to more great exhibitions in 2013!

Submissions to the iPL

5.10.2012

Interview: Blake Andrews, Part I

Blake Andrews, Emmett, 2011

This is the first of three interview posts with Eugene, Oregon-based Blake Andrews, a photographer and member of iN-PUBLiC. He runs the photography blog B and is also involved with the Portland area photography groups Lightleak and Portland Grid Project. The second part will be published next Thursday.

Blake’s early history, experiences with iN-PUBLiC, role as a photoblogger, thoughts on street photography as well as influences both contemporary and historic have been covered fairly thoroughly in interviews here, here, here, here, and here.

The following questions attempt to complement these previous interviews and you may enjoy reading one or all of them along with this one.

fototazo: I have one question for you on the blog: what kept you working on it as many others dropped theirs?

Blake Andrews: That's a good question, and well-timed too because my blog is actually now on indefinite hiatus. But during the 4+ years I kept the blog current, the main thing that kept me going was just sheer enjoyment. I like writing. I like trying ideas on for size. At a certain point the blog gained a level of inertia. It had a momentum of its own, and so I had to feed it every day. And the pouring out of ideas on one end seemed to help ideas generate on the creative end, like a siphon hose. It was there every morning staring at me like a hungry lion. Feed me.

In its last year or so the blog evolved for me into a sort of art project. I wasn't interested so much in writing expository essays as toying with the whole form. I was asking, what the heck is a blog? What is it expected to look like and why? How can it be different? So that's what generated a lot of the recent experimentation, changing headers every day and making up new profile locations and colors, and all the polls, and making the background fade like an old newspaper. I went through a long series where I gave each post a song name, and I named posts after photo books, and posted things upside down or inside out or whatever. Anything to just try something different, to keep myself entertained, to make myself laugh. When I'd write posts that made me laugh out loud that's when I knew I had something good.

Gradually I wound up creating this online persona. B is sort of a crazy cynic. I suppose there's a part of me that's like that, but in many ways it's not me at all. I'm actually a nice guy. I'm shy. But for whatever reason I carved out this territory online where I'm a weird photo-geek who'll say just about anything. And I've probably sabotaged any hope of a fine art photo career in the process. So be it. But it is troubling that people know me as a blogger rather than a photographer. People reading my blog might call for me to be committed, but the truth is I'm very committed, as a photographer.

Blake Andrews, Eugene, 2005

I guess what it comes down to is I'm not really a critic. I feel silly cranking out some educated-sounding critique about a photo project or trends or whatever. Who am I to be an authority on any of that? But what I am an authority on is my own life, and so I tried to root the blog in personal exploration. Every post had at least one subtext, and often two or three, many of which only made sense to me. It became a sort of scientific workbench, a place to dissect and recombine ideas. But in the end it was mostly for me. I often felt a disconnect with readers, like I was saying one thing and they were reading something else. The posts which really made me laugh rarely received comments.

In the past year the blog began to feel more like an obligation and less organic. If I didn't write something for a day or two, I felt like I was letting folks down. I started to track hits, page views, comments and a lot of other meaningless crap, just to try to gauge who was reading. Why did they read it? What did they want? When I found myself worrying about that stuff I knew the end was near. My post about dead photoblogs last December was a premonition, but it was unconscious. I didn't realize at the time that I was writing about myself.

A main problem since the beginning is that my blog has gotten in the way of my photography. I have many photo projects that I want to pursue and a certain amount of free time. But as long as the blog was around, it's what received my energy. Ideally there should be a way to do both, to pursue projects and keep a blog up. If I could do the blog as a little side thing and just write one post a week it would be great. Some people can do that, but I've found that style doesn't work well for me. If I'm not writing every day my posts don't have the right snap. In order to write well or perform any task really I need to get sort of obsessed. And I was obsessed with B. But it was keeping me from getting obsessed with my own photography. So on March 1st I decided to go cold turkey and put it on hold for a while. At first I just thought I'd leave it for a few weeks. I've done this before a few times when I needed to recharge and always resumed blogging. But I'm really enjoying the time off so I may extend it indefinitely. We'll see. I honestly don't know what's going to happen. It's really up in the air. I've been tinkering with it a bit lately, slowly lightening the text every few days, letting past posts fade into the blank page. I think that might be a good way to end it.

One of my projects while my blog is down is to compile B's archives into a series of Blurb books, not for sale but just to allow me to make a hardcopy of what I've done. I got freaked recently when I read that Too Much Chocolate went offline not because of a creative decision but because it'd been hacked. Someone got in and sabotaged the archives. Which really sucks, and would suck if it happened to B. Right now all if it exists only online. So I'm making a hard copy which will wind up being four books of roughly 350 pages each. Booksmart can get them into rough form but they still require some tweaking, so I'm in the process of editing now. It's been fun going through old posts and seeing the gradual changes over time. Once I get the raw posts printed I want to put the best ones into one volume for iPL.

That's one project. I have several others, but I'm not really ready to discuss them.

f: During your year of experimenting with B, did you come to any conclusions on what a blog does best? Or what its limits are as a format?

8.07.2011

f100: Pepa Hristova, Bernhard Fuchs, Daria Tuminas, Christopher Colville

© Pepa Hristova, The Club, Ribnovo, Bulgaria, 2006

fototozo has asked a group of 50 curators, gallery owners, blog writers, photographers, academics and others actively engaged in photography to pick two photographers that deserve (more) recognition - the underknown, the under-respected as well as not-appreciated-enough favorites. A little more information on the project is available in the first post in the series here.

Today we continue the series with responses from Daniel Augschoell and Larissa Leclair.

We began the series with responses from Nicholas Nixon, Matt Johnston, Blake Andrews, John Edwin Mason, Aline Smithson, Colin Pantall, Michael Werner, Liza Fetissova, Laurence Salzmann, Bryan Formhals, Richard Mosse, Shane Lavalette, Amy Stein, Amani Willett, Wayne Ford, S. Billie Mandle, Leslie K. Brown, Gordon Stettinius, Marc Feustel, Hin Chua and Adriana Rios Monsalve.

Respondent: Daniel Augschoell is a photographer and the co-editor of Ahorn Magazine. He has had his photographs published in numerous online and print publications and shown his work in exhibitions internationally. He lives and works in Berlin.

Selections: Pepa Hristova and Bernhard Fuchs

© Bernhard Fuchs, Junger Mann bei Autoreparatur, St. Stefan am Walde, 1997

Respondent: Larissa Leclair is the founder of the Indie Photobook Library, a physical archive that collects and showcases self-published and indie published photobooks. Pop-up exhibitions of photobooks from the iPL collection have been part of the Flash Forward Festival in Toronto, Photolucida, the New York Photo Festival, and Review Santa Fe among other photography festivals and reviews. The first feature-length photobook exhibition drawn from the archive will open in September 2011 at the Photographic Resource Center in Boston. She has contributed to photo-eye's Best Books annual survey, was invited to nominate a title for the 4th International Photobook Festival Photobook Award in Kassel, Germany and is a judge for the Photography Book Now 2011 competition sponsored by Blurb. As an independent curator, she most recently co-curated the exhibition "100 Portraits - 100 Photographers: Selections from the Flak Photo Archive" with Andy Adams which is touring globally during 2011. She has served as a reviewer for Critical Mass, as a juror for the Magenta Foundation Flash Forward 2011 and as an Advisory Board member and Chair of the FotoBooks Committee for FotoWeek DC.


© Daria Tuminas, from the series "Ivan and the Moon"

Selections: Daria Tuminas and Christopher Colville


© Christopher Colville, from the series "Instar"